They were preparing me for the future by being truthful and not getting my hopes up. They wanted my time with him to be honest. Not jaded. And so sure, he has complications, but I don't ever regret giving birth to him. Even if he hadn't made it, or if he was worse off than he is, I would have never regretted the decision to bring him into this world.
I really didn't want to write another dark post after Tuesday's sad book club post, but today's writing challenge over at Mama Kat's is to discuss a current event we feel passionate about. And I could write about the oil spill and how horrible it is or how the health care debate angers me. But that's not really what I am passionate about.
My passion lies in the advocacy of special needs children and their families. So, when I saw a recent story about certain medical research going on at Johns Hopkins University, my passion and subsequent anger got the better of me.
Johns Hopkins researchers are participating in a study to see if showing parents of high-risk preemies pictures of their child's potential disabilities will help those parents better make the decision as to whether to keep the babies alive or to let them go. So rather than explaining the medical diagnoses that define most preemies, they are showing parents pictures of school-aged severely-disabled children.
The women were given a hypothetical scenario and asked to make a resuscitation decision following a standard prenatal counseling for extremely premature delivery. Then they were asked to make that decision again, but this time after also viewing photos of school-aged children with a wide range of outcomes, from normal development to severe neurological and developmental disabilities associated with severe prematurity.It's as if the doctors are saying, "See these horribly disabled children? Are you sure you want to be a parent to one of them?"
“It can be hard for someone to imagine their newborn 10, 20, 30 years down the road,” says lead investigator Colleen Hughes-Driscoll, M.D., a neonatologist at Hopkins Children’s. “But with these powerful images, the data suggest we can help mothers during this critical time by making the often-confusing ‘doctor speak’ more concrete and by putting vague medical terms into real context.”
I think this is reprehensible for many reasons. For one, this study was done on women being asked to end the pregnancy early to avoid having a child with these issues. While I always support a woman's right to choose, this seems to me like a doctor-influenced decision as opposed to a woman's.
But mostly, I find this study so horrible because they don't at all factor in the lives of those children in the pictures. They are showing already vulnerable women scary pictures in an effort to end a potentially frightening experience of parenting a special needs child.
But what doctors aren't emphasizing is the way those parents will feel about their child. Sure, not every parent wants to raise a child with severe disability, but those severely-disabled children are gifts to their families every single day. Most parents of disabled children, between the tears of sadness and screams of frustration, will openly admit that they will NEVER regret giving birth to their children.
Because, they aren't just "disabled." They are boys that are into frogs and dirt and trucks. They are girls that love flowers and puppy dogs and the color pink. They are beautiful children.
Again, if parents make an informed decision to terminate, that is their decision. I do not fault them for that.
What I fault is a study done by doctors who would use suggestive media to influence that decision as opposed to embracing BOTH the positives and negatives of such a life-changing event.

















9 comments:
I took a look at the article you linked to, but did not see a reference to using the photos in counseling women to terminate a pregnancy early, but rather whether or not to offer palliative care or to resuscitate an infant. Is there another portion of the article that discusses this? I would like to read about the hospital's position on using such photos to counsel women to terminate a pregnancy.
One decision I had to make when my daughter was in the NICU and her condition deteriorated was whether or not to sign a DNR. It was a difficult and painful discussion for both me and the neonatologist.
Wow. That's just awful. Like a picture can truly define what a child is or could be.
Umm, hello, modern day Eugenics Movement. WTF? Let's electively abort kids with allergies, poor eyesight and bad teeth while we're at it. And redheads. They're always a little too fiery...
obviously, these doctors have no children. what? they do. now, that a general statement, not different from what they're doing.
from mama kat's :)
wow, all around. yes, i agree. the idea that somehow a parent would find a child's life less worth saving because of a nebulous future is dangerously in line with eugenics.
Omigosh I can't believe the doctors are doing that!! What a horrible study - and what a horrible thing to do to a parent. *shudder* Let's hope this stays just as a study and never hits real world application.
From Mama Kats
http://buninthetoaster.blogspot.com/2010/06/breast-is-best.html
Oh my goodness, that's horrible! I had no idea that something like that was being done. How degrading to the children that fight so hard just to survive their premature birth! Your potato is just beautiful and you are one truly blessed woman!
You say you are all for parents making informed decisions, but this is just part of that process. As a physician, I worked briefly with parents who were in absolute shock at the horrors they had to deal with, and wished desperately they had been told more than "it will be okay" at the beginning. I do have some issues with the methodology of the study, but the truth is parents of severely disabled children aren't the only ones affected by them. Their care, education, and lost wages (for the economists) cost a not-so-small fortune every year and particularly with a semi-nationalized healthcare system, we simply cannot afford it.
If parents are willing and able to be the amazing parents it takes and pay most of the costs, I have no problem with that. But I also have no problem with them being told up front what the consequences are.
Interesting that someone brought up eugenics. That always seems to be the knee-jerk response when people talk of making a better world. Isn't that what we all want? Don't we want a better world for our children than we had?
As a society trying to live relatively peacefully on this earth, it is in our best interests to strive for the most intelligent, most hard-working, most giving, most respectful, and most genetically fit individuals possible. Is this eugenics? Not even close. It's wanting what's best for our children, our grandchildren, and our planet.
When people with disabilities outnumber people without them, who will work to provide all the extra care those individuals require? Having children should never be just about enjoying that wonderful bundle of joy. There should be at least some thought given to what role that human will play in the grand scheme of life.
Post a Comment